<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EcoFriendOnline.com Blog &#187; toxins and waste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/category/toxins-and-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog</link>
	<description>Saving Mama Earth One Eco Friendly Blog at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>BP Oil Spill: Send Secretary of the Interior Salazar a Message</title>
		<link>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2010/06/4128/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2010/06/4128/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EcoFriend Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins and waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water conservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/?p=4128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Send Secretary of the Interior Salazar a message that you support a ban on new offshore drilling. Use our counter to track how many gallons of oil are being pumped into the gulf. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, President Obama boldly called for a &#8220;commission report&#8221; to find out what went wrong in the Gulf, while yesterday Congressman Joe Barton (R-TX) apologized to BP for their rough treatment.</p>
<p>Then, when pressed this week, the other leading oil companies gave their emergency plans for a disaster in the Gulf to Congress. The plans were nearly identical, and included efforts to save walruses and recommended calling on a marine biologist who is five years dead.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, this Saturday, while you and I are mowing our lawns or sipping on a mimosa at brunch, the BP well will be pumping out its 150,000,000th gallon of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.</p>
<p>I set up a counter on our site so you can track how many gallons are being pumped into the gulf. <a href="http://www.environmental-action.org/gulf-spill-counter?id4=ES" target="_blank"><strong>On this page</strong></a>, you can also send Secretary of the Interior Salazar a message that you support a ban on new offshore drilling:  <a href="http://www.environmental-action.org/gulf-spill-counter?id4=ES" target="_blank">http://www.environmental-action.org/gulf-spill-counter?id4=ES</a></p>
<p><!-- Thanks for costofwar.com for letting us pirate their code. Any question: dan@environmental-action.org --></p>
<p><script src="http://www.environmental-action.org/uploads/80/b6/80b6557977e0df04e99b2f793e81d75f/gulf.js"></script></p>
<div>
<div><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Estimated Gallons of Oil Spilled into the Gulf Since April 20, 2010, as a Result of the BP Oil Rig Explosion</span></strong></div>
<div id="raw">(JavaScript Error)</div>
<p> 
</p></div>
<div><a href="http://environmental-action.org/gulf-spill-counter" target="blank"><img src="/static/html/images/ealogo2.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="307" height="36" /></a></div>
<p><!-- this line triggers the counter to start --></p>
<div><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</div>
<div  mce_tmp="1">inc_totals_at_rate(100);</div>
<div  mce_tmp="1">
// ]]&gt;</script></div>
<p>Dan Stafford<br />
Environmental Action Organizer<br />
<a href="mailto:action@environmental-action.org">action@environmental-action.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.environmental-action.org/">http://www.environmental-action.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2010/06/4128/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 9 Eco-Stories of 2009 (that have nothing to do with climate change)</title>
		<link>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-top-9-eco-stories-of-2009-that-have-nothing-to-do-with-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-top-9-eco-stories-of-2009-that-have-nothing-to-do-with-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EcoFriend Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins and waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the year draws to a close, here is a list of the top 9 environmental stories in 2009 that had absolutely nothing to do with climate change: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">by Ken Edelstein</div>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 510px"><img title="2009 Top Eco Stories" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/2009_Top_Stories.jpg" alt="Photos: BPA bottle by David McNew/Getty Images; Garbage patch courtesy NOAA; Bee courtesy Wikimedia Commons; Water drop by Emrank/Flickr; Michael Pollan by Zuma Press; Bat by Furryscaly/Flickr" width="500" height="94" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photos: BPA bottle by David McNew/Getty Images; Garbage patch courtesy NOAA; Bee courtesy Wikimedia Commons; Water drop by Emrank/Flickr; Michael Pollan by Zuma Press; Bat by Furryscaly/Flickr</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p>Here, as the year draws to a close, is my list of the top 9 environmental stories in 2009 that had absolutely nothing to do with climate change.</p>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>1. The danger lurking inside your baby’s bottle:</strong> The <em><a href="http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/34405049.html" target="_blank">Milwaukee Journal</a></em> takes the cake this year for old-fashioned investigative reporting on an old-fashioned toxics story. Actually, the newspaper has been investigating bisphenol A (commonly referred to as BPA) — in food containers and other consumer plastic goods — for two years. But 2009 was the year that the investigation bore fruit: Other media began following the story about lax regulation and industry-funded studies, which skewed the science for years on a toxin that actually poses a risk for infants drinking out of baby bottles and people who microwave their food in containers. Finally, it appears the Food &amp; Drug Administration <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/78190152.html" target="_blank">may take action</a>. At the very least, all that negative publicity has given consumer-product companies reason to switch to products that don’t contain BPA.</div>
<p><strong>2. Carping about Asian carp:</strong> What is it about marine species from Asia that makes them such an exotic threat in North America waters? Zebra muscles. <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0702_020702_snakehead.html" target="_blank">Walking snakehead</a>. And, now, the Asian carp is about to take over the Great Lakes. Each invader deserves a science fiction movie. In the carp’s case, you’ve got the marine scientist/hero who discovered DNA from Asian carp in water samples taken from streams that flow into the Lake <a href="http://www.mnn.com/local-reports/michigan" target="_blank">Michigan</a>. You’ve got the government agency (Army Corps of Engineers) that reluctantly acknowledged the problem in November. And you’ve got <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/79429272.html" target="_blank">posturing politicians</a> raising the temperature for everyone by threatening lawsuits. &#8220;I am determined to take appropriate action to ensure that the integrity of Lake Michigan is not harmed by the introduction of these carp,&#8221; the attorney general of <a href="http://www.mnn.com/local-reports/wisconsin" target="_blank">Wisconsin</a> warned just the other day. Most of all, you’ve got the carp itself — a preferred food in East Asia that undermines the fish-eat-fish food chain from one end to the other. The story would only be better if Asian carp ate people; their main food source turns out to be plankton, which seems a lot less dramatic.</p>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>3. Awash in coal ash:</strong> Last December, a <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/energy/videos/assignment-earth-coal-ash-spill-in-tennessee" target="_blank">Tennessee Valley Authority coal-ash dump</a> overflowed and sent 5.4 million cubic yards of the toxic substance into nearby rivers. The backwash from that disaster created a lasting story on into in 2009. The spill contained <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iYSHdC9VobTzyi05Mh6PLDEB7wWwD9CFDESG4" target="_blank">massive amounts of toxins</a>, enough to make the Exxon Valdez oil spill sound like a little leak. Once it became clear that the Environmental Protection Agency had ignored an ecological and public health hazard that literally was mounting up in plain sight, a handful of activists and reporters jumped on the larger story: There are hundreds of such dumps all around the country, some of which could lead to similar spills under the right conditions. The EPA finally did announce its intention to regulate the dumps. But the problem is so large and has been neglected for so long that it’s doubtful that the agency will have the guts to produce a <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/22982/environmentalists-fear-possible-loophole-in-epa-coal-ash-rules" target="_blank">regulation far-reaching enough</a> to get the problem under control. The long-range problem is that a lot of the coal ash is a byproduct of trying to reduce the pollution that coal sends into the atmosphere. And if the U.S. relies on so-called “clean coal” to keep carbon emissions down, the effort to combat climate change could create even more coal ash. Oops! There’s that darned climate change popping up again. I just can’t get away from it.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>4. Fix my plumbing:</strong> When the <em><a href="http://livepage.apple.com/" target="_blank">New York Times</a></em> takes on a big investigation, it tends to get noticed. That doesn’t mean that anything happens because it’s noticed, but at least public officials can’t say they didn’t know about it. For the last five months, reporter Charles Duhigg has been filing stories as part of a series called “<a href="http://projects.nytimes.com/toxic-waters" target="_blank">Toxic Waters</a>.” It’s about “the worsening pollution in American waters and regulators’ response.” In the shadow of climate change and economic calamity, I’m not sure that the stories have led to action. The bottom line is that regulators have seldom acted over the last two decades even when incidents and studies showed that pollution was violating the Clean Water Act. Duhigg identified a variety of problems that degrade natural systems and threaten drinking water. He also exposed a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/us/23sewer.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1" target="_blank">$400 billion infrastructure problem</a> that we haven’t begun to deal with &#8212; not even with President Obama’s recent stimulus package.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>5. The global water shortage: </strong>Nearly one billion people lack access to safe water, according to <a href="http://water.org/" target="_blank">Water.org</a>, a nonprofit group dedicated toward resolving the global water shortage. And the situation is only getting worse. In India, wells that were dug just a few short years ago to resolve water shortages are running dry. Multinational beverage companies argue that the key to ensuring supplies of the rapidly diminishing resource lies in unlocking the profit motive, so that prospecting for water and caring for water resources lies in the companies’ self-interest; environmentalists and non-profits counter that the large companies simply are trying to lock up water rights, which could exacerbate the shortage for people who can’t afford to buy water. What’s causing the problem? Unwise development. Overpopulation. A lack of infrastructure resources. And &#8230; um &#8230; wait a second &#8230; climate change? How’d that sneak in there? Rising temperatures are changing weather patterns, so that dependable supplies of water aren’t available where they once were, and are causing more evaporation so that less water is stored in natural or manmade reservoirs.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>6. The mysterious deaths of bats: </strong>First it was frogs and other amphibians. Now, it’s bats. Soon we’re not going to have any animals to eat bugs for us. The cave-dwelling mammals live in huge colonies &#8212; nasty habitats that you’d think would make them immune to just about any disease. But those big colonies apparently make them vulnerable, too. Fewer and fewer habitats already has caused their numbers to shrink, before the mysterious “<a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/white-nose-syndrome-haunts-bats" target="_blank">white-nose syndrome</a>” was accompanied by massive die-offs. Bat populations are declining elsewhere, but so far the decline appears most dramatic in the Northeast, where wildlife officials are reporting only a one-in-10 survival rate.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>7. The mysterious disappearance of bees:</strong> Honeybees are more important than most city folk realize. They pollinate an enormous variety of crops and wild plants. In 2006, beekeepers and then biologists started noticing an unexplained phenomenon &#8212; “colony collapse syndrome.” Previously healthy hives would suddenly lose almost their entire population; nobody was sure where the bees went. This is science fiction creepy, the kind of thing that happens before the aliens invade. But it’s no joke. The collapse of bee colonies could lead to global agricultural calamity. This year, at least, brought some good news: more understanding of what may be causing the colonies to collapse and of <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/bees-bred-to-fight-back-against-colony-collapse-disorder" target="_blank">potential solutions</a>.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>8. The garbage vortex: </strong>This was the year that the <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/what-is-the-great-pacific-ocean-garbage-patch" target="_blank">Great Pacific Ocean Garbage Patch</a>, which I should mention is <em>twice the size of <a href="http://www.mnn.com/local-reports/texas" target="_blank">Texas</a>, </em>got a ring of its own in the media circus. Two expeditions headed to the whirling monument to humankind, both to research the phenomenon and to draw attention to it. Now, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/12/14/2770971.htm" target="_blank">an Australian man</a> is on his way to the garbage patch via swimming. Of course, anything that’s <em>twice the size of Texas</em> ought to be able to draw attention to itself. It turns out that the Garbage Patch draws a lot more to itself than attention &#8212; most of its refuse actually comes from sources on land rather than from ships: trash swept away by rivers and tides is carried to the giant vortex. There’s even talk now about <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/226308" target="_blank">cleaning it up</a>. By the way did I mention that the spot is now <em>twice the size of Texas</em>?</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong>9. Food, the way nature intended: </strong>I know, I know. You’re going to try to count this one against me because vegetarians and locavores are all about reducing their carbon footprint. Fair enough. But I still say the rise of slow, local, organic food has a lot more to do with a reaction to industrial agriculture, for its own sake. The movement took off over the last couple of years with books like <strong><a href="http://www.michaelpollan.com/" target="_blank"><em>The Omnivore’s Dilemma</em></a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/s/schlosser-fast.html" target="_blank"><em>Fast Food Nation</em></a></strong>. But it really hit a high point in 2009, when the movie <strong><em><a href="http://www.foodincmovie.com/" target="_blank">Food Inc.</a></em></strong> &#8212; starring the authors of those two books &#8212; hit theaters and surely got more than a handful of people to put down their Big Macs.</div>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em>Written by Ken Edelstein; reprinted from Mother Nature Network</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-top-9-eco-stories-of-2009-that-have-nothing-to-do-with-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The High Cost of Cheap T-Shirts</title>
		<link>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-high-cost-of-cheap-t-shirts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-high-cost-of-cheap-t-shirts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EcoFriend Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins and waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Learn how that $3 T-shirt could be creating water shortages, trade imbalances and environmental pollution. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div></div>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: left;">Learn how that $3 T-shirt could be creating water shortages, trade imbalances and environmental pollution.</div>
<div></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/T-Shirt_Sale_Table.jpg" alt="Photo: Johnnie Utah/Flickr " width="300" height="167" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Johnnie Utah/Flickr </p></div>
<p> </p>
<div>In his book <em><a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/books/blogs/whats-your-ecological-intelligence" target="_blank">Ecological Intelligence</a></em>, Daniel Goleman argues that even organic cotton T-shirts aren’t necessarily very eco-friendly, since they can still be shipped all around the world to be sewn together in sweatshop conditions before being chemically dyed in a polluting facility. Of course, conventionally grown cotton T-shirts still fare much worse under eco-scrutiny, especially those grown and made in China.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Just how ecologically damaging those “all-natural” T-shirts are has been laid bare, thanks to a feature article in the latest issue of <em>Miller-McCune</em> magazine. In “<a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/science_environment/can-china-turn-cotton-green-1638" target="_blank">Can China Turn Cotton Green?</a>” Chris Wood takes a close look at a study conducted by the International Institute for Sustainable Development in Winnipeg, Canada, that drew from an international network of experts to look at the cotton T-shirt manufacturing process.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As you may have expected, environmental problems caused by the common cotton T-shirt range widely, from irrigation-based farming practices that strain water supplies and damage ecosystems, to overuse of chemical fertilizers, to water pollution from dye wastes:</div>
<blockquote>
<div>Only about 10 percent of dye wastes are recycled, and about a third of the rest flows directly to the environment. In provinces like Xinjiang, this waste is a major contributor to industrial and municipal pollution so severe that nearly 1 in 4 of China’s 1.3 billion people drink contaminated water every day.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Beyond China, the article gives some broader insights into the international cotton market. For example, did you know that conventional cotton from Africa is made with a lot less chemical fertilizer and pesticides than that from China?</div>
<blockquote>
<div>The researchers found that the use of agrichemicals differed widely among major supply regions, with China’s own farmers dosing their fields with six times more fertilizer and pesticide than growers in sub-Saharan Africa. American farmers and others in Brazil fall somewhere in the middle.</div>
</blockquote>
<div>And did you know that because of corporate consolidation, “the power to influence change” in the cotton-textile chain lies with a “relatively small number of increasingly global participants”? For example, Walmart and Kmart account for a quarter of all the clothing sold in the U.S.! Combine the power of those big players with the many challenges of enforcing environmental policies and guidelines through “local governments whose incentives are dominated by economic development,” and green concerns can get pushed aside. In addition, government subsidies given to cotton farmers in the U.S., China and European countries tends to harm small producers by lowering cotton prices, giving little incentive to invest in greener practices.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>The news isn’t all doom and gloom. The article by Woods also points to some suggestions from the study — ranging from shifting to less-irrigation-based, more rain-fed farming and downsizing cotton farm subsidies to consumer pressures for greener trade and greener products — that could help green up cotton T-shirts grown and made in China or anywhere.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you’re a conscious consumer, read “<a href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/science_environment/can-china-turn-cotton-green-1638" target="_blank">Can China Turn Cotton Green?</a>” for a great primer on cotton and the cotton trade. It will help you make better purchasing decisions by learning to ask better, more meaningful questions instead of simply buying a cheap T-shirt on a whim.</div>
<div><em> </em></div>
<div><em>Written by Siel Ju, Reprinted from Mother Nature Network</em></div>
<div><em> </em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/12/the-high-cost-of-cheap-t-shirts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How does groundwater pollution occur?</title>
		<link>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/10/how-does-groundwater-pollution-occur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/10/how-does-groundwater-pollution-occur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EcoFriend Kim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxins and waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farms, freeways and front yards are flooding underground aquifers with dangerous toxins, slowly poisoning many communities' water supplies. But how can this happen? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp" style="text-align: center;">
<dl class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 493px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><img src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_1.jpg" alt="Infographic: Nick Scott / MNN" width="483" height="379" /></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Infographic: Nick Scott / MNN</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<div>Farms, freeways and front yards are flooding underground aquifers with dangerous toxins, slowly poisoning many communities&#8217; water supplies. But how can this happen?</div>
<p>For a planet where water covers 70 percent of the surface, Earth certainly makes its residents work hard for a drink. Aside from fish and other saltwater-sipping sea life, most of us have to share what little freshwater we can find on land.</p>
<div class="content clear node-body">And that&#8217;s no small task. Only 3 percent of all water on Earth is <a class="external" href="http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthwherewater.html" target="_blank">freshwater</a>, more than two-thirds of which is locked up in glaciers and ice caps. Of the other third, barely a trickle collects on the surface — lakes, rivers, streams and swamps represent less than 0.5 percent of all freshwater worldwide.</div>
<div class="content clear node-body">So where&#8217;s the rest of it? An estimated 2.5 million cubic miles of freshwater are neither frozen, floating nor flowing on the surface, yet they account for at least 30 percent of total freshwater on the planet. Don&#8217;t bother looking <em>on</em> the planet for all that water, though; it&#8217;s actually <em>in</em> the planet. And while such a hidden location usually makes this underground ocean of freshwater safer to drink, it can also make it more dangerous — something the EPA recently acknowledged when it announced plans to <a href="http://www.mnn.com/home-blog/green-news-roundup/blogs/weekend-briefing-25#water">crack down</a> on the country&#8217;s biggest water polluters.</div>
<p class="1"><strong>What is groundwater?</strong></p>
<p>Groundwater is simply water — mainly from rain and snow, but also from some human activities — that has soaked into the soil. That&#8217;s the end of its journey from our perspective, but the water keeps going long after it&#8217;s gone underground. It percolates downward, with dirt and rock particles filtering out dangerous bacteria as it sinks. When it finally reaches an impermeable layer of bedrock deep below the surface, it stops and begins to saturate the surrounding soil. Over many millennia, this pool of purified groundwater can grow into vast subterranean <a class="external" href="http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/earthgwaquifer.html" target="_blank">aquifers</a>.</p>
<p>Some groundwater may eventually become encased in rock thanks to gradual geologic shifting, forming pressurized pockets known as &#8220;confined aquifers.&#8221; These require complex drilling and pumping operations to extract their contents, leaving such deep deposits mainly for industrial uses such as large-scale farm irrigation. Other groundwater deposits are limited only by water supply and the bedrock below, and these &#8220;unconfined aquifers&#8221; make up the majority of residential groundwater sources in the United States.</p>
<div>The Earth&#8217;s crust is so waterlogged that fresh groundwater alone — not counting salty groundwater, which is even more abundant — outweighs all aboveground liquid freshwater 100 to 1. Much of it&#8217;s too deep or blocked by rocks for us to economically reach, but we can still get to the roughly 1 million cubic miles closest to the surface.</div>
<div>In fact, some aquifers have been so heavily pumped that their water level has dropped too low for people to tap. Humans have overexploited many aquifers around the world, often trying to <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/levels-of-indian-groundwater-have-dropped-dramatically">prop up an agriculture industry</a> with a dwindling source of water.</div>
<div><img style="margin: 3px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_3.jpg" border="1" alt="well" hspace="10" vspace="3" align="right" />Groundwater&#8217;s quantity is far from the only concern, however; its quality is also under constant assault from a variety of sources. Natural poisoning of groundwater has long been known to occur around the world, as underground deposits of arsenic, heavy metals or even <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/epa-the-rising-threat-of-radon">radon</a> can seep into an aquifer and contaminate its contents. It&#8217;s also possible that toxin-producing bacteria can naturally infiltrate an aquifer, despite the cleansing effects of soil and rocks above.</div>
<p> </p>
<div> But humans indirectly pose an even greater threat to many aquifers — and to the fellow humans who drink from them. Although more Americans get their drinking water from surface sources like lakes and rivers, there are more water systems nationwide that use groundwater as their source than surface water (about 147,000 to 14,500), and hundreds of thousands more people who use private wells. And just as these wells are scattered throughout the country, often in remote rural areas, so are the diverse sources of pollutants that contaminate them.</div>
<div><img style="margin: 3px 4px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_4.jpg" border="1" alt="stormwater runoff" hspace="4" vspace="3" align="left" /></div>
<p> </p>
<div><strong>What is runoff?</strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div><a class="external" href="http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/runoff.html" target="_blank">Runoff</a> in general is a daunting enemy. Whenever it rains — or when a large amount of snow or ice melts — an inconspicuous yet widespread flood of water picks up any loose liquids it passes along the way, including <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/epa-to-evaluate-whether-common-weed-killer-harms-more-than-weeds">lawn chemicals</a>, cleaning solvents and gasoline, and washes them through the watershed.</div>
<p>Some of this is dumped into streams and rivers, where it&#8217;s concentrated and carried far away. That&#8217;s how farm and lawn runoff has helped create hundreds of coastal &#8220;<a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/what-is-the-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone">dead zones</a>&#8221; around the world, or areas where a buildup of fertilizer feeds giant algae blooms that deplete the water&#8217;s oxygen, making it inhospitable to marine life. Major U.S. dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico and Chesapeake Bay are widely blamed on farm runoff, since their tributaries pass through many large agricultural areas.</p>
<p>Cities&#8217; and suburbs&#8217; stormwater is also a major source of trouble, often containing motor oil, gasoline, weed killers, insecticides, bleach, paint thinner, and any other substances dumped or left out in the open. Cleaning solvents such as dry cleaners&#8217; <a href="http://www.mnn.com/the-home/household-products/stories/green-dry-cleaning">perchloroethylene</a> (a potential carcinogen) can be caught up in runoff, as can <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/beauty-fashion/stories/be-label-smart">parabens</a> and other suspected endocrine disruptors often found in laundry soap and shampoo — chemicals that seem to be turning male <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/the-gender-gap">frogs</a> and <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/male-bass-in-many-us-rivers-feminized-study-finds">fish</a> into females.</p>
<p>In urban places where impermeable surfaces like concrete or asphalt cover the ground, more of this runoff flows for longer distances, picking up more toxins on the way. And while much of it ends up in sewers and streams, plenty of runoff is also soaked up by soil, where it sinks downward and replenishes aquifers.</p>
<p>This can happen around big farms and animal-feeding operations, where fertilizers, pesticides, and manure often exist in large concentrations. When farm runoff drifts down into the ground, it can sometimes overload the soil&#8217;s filtration system and taint groundwater below. Some of the most dangerous agricultural pollutants include:</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li><strong><img style="margin: 5px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_5.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="10" vspace="5" align="right" />Fertilizers:</strong> In estuaries and coastal waters, fertilizers often create algae blooms and <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/what-is-the-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone">dead zones</a>. In groundwater, they can lead to the buildup of nitrates, which are carcinogenic. They can also impede infants&#8217; ability to transport oxygen in their blood, leading to &#8220;<a class="external" href="http://healthvermont.gov/enviro/water/nitrates.aspx#effects" target="_blank">blue baby syndrome</a>.&#8221;</li>
<li><strong>Bacteria:</strong> Leaky or overflowing sewers and septic tanks can release bacteria-laden human waste into surface water and soil, potentially contaminating drinking-water sources. But concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) often deal in even larger amounts of waste. Farmers spread manure across fields as fertilizer, and many let it collect in wastewater lagoons lined with plastic to stop it from seeping into groundwater. Soil normally would filter out harmful bacteria anyway, but large enough concentrations can make it through and <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/lax-oversight-creates-toxic-water-supply">contaminate an aquifer</a>. Such incidents are rarely scientifically proven, however, given the difficulty of tracing an individual illness back to bacteria deep in the soil. The EPA regulates livestock operations with more than 700 cows, but the <em><a class="external" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/us/18dairy.html" target="_blank">New York Times</a></em> reported in September that those regulations are rarely enforced and farmers often aren&#8217;t required to turn in paperwork. EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has since <a class="external" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/business/energy-environment/16water.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;ref=earth&amp;adxnnlx=1255968095-QuSLCkvrsm2UFKTr8L2muw" target="_blank">responded</a> by announcing that the agency will overhaul the way it enforces the 1972 Clean Water Act.</li>
<li><img style="margin: 4px 8px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_6.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="8" vspace="4" align="right" /><strong>Pesticides:</strong> DDT famously washed into U.S. waterways in the 1960s and &#8217;70s, moving up the food chain into fish and eventually into bald eagles — the synthetic pesticide soon began <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/videos/natural-south-return-of-the-raptors">thinning out bald eagles&#8217; eggshells</a> so much it pushed the national bird to the brink of extinction. Not all pesticides bioaccumulate this way, and the most toxic era of pesticide use (copper and chlorine compounds, for example) is long behind us. But large crop fields, as well as private lawns and golf courses, are still sprayed with many EPA-regulated insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. Studies have linked one common weed killer, <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/epa-to-evaluate-whether-common-weed-killer-harms-more-than-weeds">atrazine</a>, to birth defects, cancer and low sperm counts in humans, and the EPA recently announced it will re-examine its previous findings that the chemical is harmless to human health.</li>
<li><img style="margin: 4px 8px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_7.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="8" vspace="4" align="right" /><strong>Antibiotics:</strong> Cattle, hogs and other livestock in CAFOs are often given a regimen of <a href="http://www.mnn.com/food/farms-gardens/stories/study-shows-crops-absorb-antibiotics-from-livestock">pre-emptive antibiotics</a>, warding off the bacterial diseases that would normally flourish in such an environment. While many livestock industries have come to rely on such drugs, they may also be helping make some bacteria more drug-resistant. Overexposure to antibiotics can help bacteria evolve an immunity to the drugs, weeding out the weaker individuals and leaving more hardy ones alive to reproduce. In theory, this phenomenon can eventually create &#8220;superbugs,&#8221; or drug-resistant strains of bacteria and viruses. In July, the Obama administration announced it was seeking a <a href="http://www.mnn.com/food/farms-gardens/stories/study-shows-crops-absorb-antibiotics-from-livestock">ban on unnecessary antibiotics in livestock</a>, although similar attempts have been shot down before by the agribusiness lobby.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Other sources</strong></p>
<p>City and farm runoff aren&#8217;t the only sources of groundwater pollution. Here are four other substantial threats to clean groundwater supplies:</p>
<ul>
<li><img style="margin: 5px 10px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_8.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="10" vspace="5" align="right" /><strong>Natural gas drilling:</strong> A process known as hydraulic fracturing, or &#8220;<a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/epa-chemicals-found-in-wyo-drinking-water-might-be-from-fracking">fracking</a>,&#8221; is often used to drill for natural gas. A blend of chemicals is mixed with water and blasted deep into cracks in the ground, opening them up to make the gas more accessible. EPA scientists are currently conducting an investigation into whether natural gas drilling is contaminating groundwater sources in some Western states — many houses have been abandoned after <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/natural-gas-and-water-supplies-all-is-not-well">methane seeped into the water</a>, and at least one house exploded in 2003, killing three people inside.</li>
<li><strong>Mining:</strong> Mad rushes for gold, silver, <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/govt-stands-by-as-mercury-taints-water">mercury</a> and other metals left a toxic legacy throughout many Western states during the 1800s and early 1900s, paralleled by current and former <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/energy/stories/epa-to-delay-79-coal-mining-permits">coal mines</a> in the East and Midwest. Toxins such as lead and arsenic were used in 19th-century mining, and often persist today in abandoned mine shafts. A <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/federal-study-shows-mercury-in-fish-widespread">recent study</a> by the U.S. Geological Survey found nearly every inland freshwater fish species is contaminated to some degree with mercury, a combination of mine runoff and emissions from burning fossil fuels, namely coal.</li>
<li><img style="margin: 4px 8px; border: black 1px solid;" src="http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/Images/Groundwater_Pollution_9.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="8" vspace="4" align="right" /><strong>Military bases:</strong> Some U.S. military facilities have been criticized over the years for polluting local water sources, although the Defense Department has worked recently to lessen its environmental impact. But many bases are still plagued by contamination from long ago — the Associated Press reported earlier this month that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has spent $116 million cleaning up 58 Cold War-era nuclear missile sites that were contaminated with <a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/pollution-an-enduring-legacy-at-old-missile-sites">trichloroethylene</a> (TCE), a chemical that was used to clean and maintain warheads but has since drifted into some groundwater supplies. TCE is believed to damage the human nervous system, lungs and liver, and can cause abnormal heartbeat, coma or even death. It&#8217;s also &#8220;reasonably anticipated&#8221; to cause cancer in humans, according to the National Toxicology Program, and the total nationwide cleanup may cost $400 million before it&#8217;s finished.</li>
<li><strong>Saltwater intrusion:</strong> By overpumping an aquifer near the coast, people are in danger of creating a vacuum that can quickly be filled with salty seawater. Known as &#8220;<a class="external" href="http://water.usgs.gov/ogw/gwrp/saltwater/salt.html" target="_blank">saltwater intrusion</a>,&#8221; this phenomenon can make a water supply undrinkable and useless for irrigation, effectively rubbing saltwater in the wound of already-low water levels.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<div>For more information about <a href="http://www.mnn.com/eco-glossary/water-pollution">water pollution</a> and <a href="http://www.mnn.com/eco-glossary/water-conservation">water conservation</a>, see these related articles on MNN:</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/the-home/recycling/videos/brighter-living-conserving-water-indoors" target="_blank">Brighter Living: Conserving water indoors</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/the-home/gardening-landscaping/questions/how-can-i-be-smart-about-watering-my-lawn-and-garden" target="_self">How can I be smart about watering my lawn and garden?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/lax-oversight-creates-toxic-water-supply" target="_blank">Lax oversight creates toxic water supply</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/what-is-the-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone" target="_blank">What is the Gulf of Mexico dead zone?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/translating-uncle-sam/stories/usgs-what-happened-to-the-everglades" target="_blank">What happened to the Everglades?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/epa-to-evaluate-whether-common-weed-killer-harms-more-than-weeds" target="_blank">EPA to evaluate whether common weed killer harms more than weeds</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/health/stories/epa-chemicals-found-in-wyo-drinking-water-might-be-from-fracking" target="_blank">EPA: Chemicals found in Wyo. drinking water might be from fracking</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/levels-of-indian-groundwater-have-dropped-dramatically" target="_blank">Levels of Indian groundwater have dropped dramatically, study says</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilderness-resources/stories/as-las-vegas-spreads-into-the-desert-water-gets-even-more" target="_blank">As Las Vegas spreads into the desert, water gets even more scarce</a></li>
<li><a href="http://" target="_blank">School drinking water contains toxins, AP investigation finds</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>By Russell McLendon; Reprinted from MNN.com</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecofriendonline.com/blog/2009/10/how-does-groundwater-pollution-occur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

